Hawkinberry v. Metz
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MilleR, Judge:
The sufficiency of the bill upon demurrer, sustained by *638the circuit court, has been certified to us for our judgment thereon.
The object of the bill, disclosed by its prayer, is either to compel a reconveyance by the defendants to plaintiff, directly or by a commissioner, of a tract of fifteen acres and the life estate of plaintiff in five acres, in Marion County, or that plaintiff’s deed or contract be canceled as a cloud upon her title.
As a basis for this relief it is alleged in the bill that the plaintiff at the instance of the defendant, her daughter, on August 9, 1906,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Troll v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
- Wilson v. BradenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Caswell v. CaswellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. HoltWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
- Smith v. HenningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tate v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- United Shoe Repairing MacHine Co. v. CarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gleason v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Bobbitt v. BobbittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
- Amherst Land Company v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.