Legal Opinion

Senner v. Danewolf

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The plaintiff, who was successful below has moved to strike from the files the bill of exceptions filed by the defendants on the ground that the time within which it was presented to the circuit court was in violation of Oregon Code 1930, § 2-703. The material provisions of that section of our laws are:

“A proposed bill of exceptions may be tendered by presenting it to the clerk of the court within sixty (60) days after the entry of the judgment or decree, or within such further time as may be granted by order of the court.”

The judgment was entered April 23, 1930; thus the sixty days granted…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Rossiter v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hamilton v. UNION OIL COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952
  5. State v. TerwilligerOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API