Legal Opinion
Kimble v. Georgia Pacific Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided November 7, 2002No. CIV.A.00-744-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRADY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment (doc. 25) filed by Georgia Pacific Corporation (“Defendant Corporation”). Kimberly Kimble (“Plaintiff’) filed an opposition to the motion for summary judgment, to which Defendant Corporation filed a reply brief. There is no need for oral argument. Subject matter jurisdiction in this Court exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).
I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE, FACTUAL BACKGROUND, AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS
Plaintiff brings this lawsuit alleging the following: (1)…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stone v. Louisiana Department of RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2014