Legal Opinion

Herre Bros. v. Rhoads

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1966No. Appeal, No. 41PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

Plaintiff-appellant recovered a judgment of $8,-351.12 in an action of assumpsit based on three claims: (a) under a written contract for the construction of a *359restaurant building; (b) a supplemental written contract for the furnishing of restaurant fixtures and kitchen equipment; (c) an oral agreement for additional restaurant fixtures and kitchen equipment. The jury allowed a recovery on each count, although in an amount which was less than plaintiff claimed. The jury also allowed the defendant-appellee the sum of $12,316.13 with costs on a counterclaim. The costs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. ERKMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kohn v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Castellucci v. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Schreffler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Armstead v. MillerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  5. Industrial Loan Corp. v. U. S. F. & G. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API