Herre Bros. v. Rhoads
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Montgomery, J.,
Plaintiff-appellant recovered a judgment of $8,-351.12 in an action of assumpsit based on three claims: (a) under a written contract for the construction of a *359restaurant building; (b) a supplemental written contract for the furnishing of restaurant fixtures and kitchen equipment; (c) an oral agreement for additional restaurant fixtures and kitchen equipment. The jury allowed a recovery on each count, although in an amount which was less than plaintiff claimed. The jury also allowed the defendant-appellee the sum of $12,316.13 with costs on a counterclaim. The costs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kennedy v. ERKMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kohn v. KohnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Castellucci v. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Schreffler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Armstead v. MillerPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1971
- Industrial Loan Corp. v. U. S. F. & G. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1966