Legal Opinion

Pennyton Homes, Inc. v. Planning Board of Stanhope

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1964PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.

This land subdivision approval case involves a question not specifically passed upon in Levin v. Township of Livingston, 35 N. J. 500 (1961), and Hilton Acres v. Klein, 35 N. J. 570 (1961), viz., whether improvements which a municipality may require a developer to install at his expense are confined to those specified by ordinance at the time tentative approval of the subdivision is granted.

The rights conferred by tentative approval are set forth in the following portion of section 18 of the Municipal Planning Act (1953), N. J. S. A. 40:55-1.18:

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Levin v. Township of LivingstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Hilton Acres v. KleinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Pennyton Homes Inc. v. Planning Bd. of StanhopeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sagebrush Ltd. v. Carson CityNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People Ex Rel. Exchange National Bank v. City of Lake ForestIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sandler v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF SPRINGFIELD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Battaglia v. Wayne Township Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  5. Hamlin v. MatarazzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API