Legal Opinion

Sagebrush Ltd. v. Carson City

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1983No. 14143PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Mowbray, J.:

Appellants contend that NRS 278.335(1), which requires local governments to forward copies of tentative subdivision maps to various state agencies for review, creates a duty on the part of respondents toward appellants, the violation of which is negligence per se. We disagree, and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

THE FACTS

Carson Tahoe Ventures, appellants’ predecessor in interest, submitted a tentative map for the so-called Lahontan Subdivision to the Carson City Planning Commission on February 1, 1978. Appellants subsequently acquired the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Boyles v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Namauu v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Thomas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Iverson v. SolsberyColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sanchez Ex Rel. Sanchez v. Wal-MartNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ashwood v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Anderson v. BaltrusaitisNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dubray v. HowsharWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Vega v. Eastern Courtyard AssociatesNevada Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API