Legal Opinion

Fred Hager v. National Union Electric Co. D/B/A the Kent Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 12, 1988No. 87-2673PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Fred Hager, appeals from a judgment of the district court granting summary judgment on his claim of retaliatory discharge against his former employer. The district court, applying Indiana choice of law rules, determined that the law of New York governed the rights of the parties. It further determined that New York does not recognize the tort of retaliatory discharge. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case for further consideration.

I

Background

A.Facts

The Kent Company (Kent) manufactures…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Hubbard Manufacturing Co. v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ppg Industries, Inc. v. George RussellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Management Science America, Inc. v. NCR Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
  3. Jean v. DuganDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
  5. Sommers v. 13300 Brandon Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API