Legal Opinion

United States v. David E. Lawson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 20, 1991No. 89-50623PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of jurisdiction the indictment against David Lawson for theft of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641. At issue in this case is whether the district court erred in deciding that the proceeds of auctioned property are not “government property” within the meaning of the statute. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 and we affirm.

I

David Lawson was an auctioneer who owned and operated Lawson & Lawson Auctioneers, Inc., a California corporation. Pursuant to an ongoing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Frank M. Long, Steak N' Lobster, Inc., Reagan Joe BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. Clemens Rolph JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Gordana KristoficCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mystic Color Lab, Inc. v. Auctions Worldwide, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Webb v. Internal Revenue Service of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Martini E Ricci Lamino S.P.A.-Consortile Societa Agricola v. Trinity Fruit Sales Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  4. United States v. Michael KranovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Martini E Ricci Iamino S.P.A.—Consortile Societa Agricola v. Western Fresh Marketing Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API