Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Santos v. Nicolos

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Cynthia S. Kern, J.

Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action against defendants to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile *1000accident. He has brought the present application to preclude defendants’ proposed expert, Dr. Charles Coward, from testifying at trial. On March 3, 2009, this court held a Frye hearing to determine whether Dr. Coward, a biomechanical engineer, should be allowed to testify as to his opinion that the plaintiff could not have sustained a meniscus tear and a serious injury to his lumbar spine based on the way that the accident occurred. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Claude I. Smelser v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Marsh v. SmythAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Lara v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Selig v. Pfizer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Fraser v. 301-52 Townhouse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. RISH VS. SIMAO C/W 59208/59423Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  3. RISH VS. SIMAO C/W 59208/59423Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  4. RISH VS. SIMAO C/W 59208/59423Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. RISH VS. SIMAO C/W 59208/59423Nevada Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API