Legal Opinion
Selig v. Pfizer, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 17, 2002PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Orders and judgments (two papers), Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered September 22, 2000, and order and judgment (one paper), same court (Jane Solomon, J.), entered April 20, 2001, which, in each of the above-captioned actions granted defendant’s motion to preclude the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Expert testimony purportedly based on scientific principles or procedures is only admissible after the “principle or procedure has ‘gained general acceptance’ in its specified field”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Selig v. Pfizer, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2000
3Cited by21 opinions
- Zito v. ZabarskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lara v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nonnon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Saulpaugh v. KrafteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.