Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Paragould Light & Water Commission

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 28, 2016No. CV-15-523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert J. Gladwin, Chief Judge

h Nearly ten years ago, appellee Para-gould Light & Water Commission (PLWC) petitioned the Greene County Circuit Court to enjoin appellants Connie and Richard Watkins from interfering with PLWC’s efforts to trim trees around its electrical power lines. 1 The lawsuit grew in size and complexity when Mr. and Mrs. Watkins filed a pro se counterclaim that asserted over twenty causes of action ranging from breach of contract to intentional torts to civil-rights violations. The counterclaim was ultimately dismissed by | gsummary judgment, and the circuit court entered an order enjoining Mr. and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dupwe v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Henry v. EberhardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Ward v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Watkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. McLemore v. ElliotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foster v. Estate of CollinsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  2. Watkins v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Barton v. BrockintonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  4. Betty Freeman v. Conway Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020
  5. Hagar v. ShullCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API