Jumiska v. Andrews
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Otter Tail county to recover .|82.08, and interest, for the conversion of wheat. The case was tried before Baxter, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. From a judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDovela, J.
Plaintiff owned a quantity of wheat raised on his farm in Otter Tail county. He was indebted to the Deering Harvester Company, and gave a note therefor, secured by a chattel mortgage, which, *516on its face, covered a harvester and wheat raised on his farm. The mortgage was foreclosed. Defendants purchased the wheat at the sale. Plaintiff brings this action to recover it. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. At the close of the evidence defendants requested an instructed verdict in their favor, which was denied. A verdict was returned for plaintiff. Defendants then moved for judgment in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCall v. BushnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Oxford v. Nichols & Shepherd Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Plano Manufacturing Co v. Northern Pacific Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schmeisser v. AlbinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Rosenberg v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Giller v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Kautenberger v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915