McCall v. Bushnell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from.an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Buckkam, J., presiding, (acting for a judge of the second district,) refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The defendants are partners, engaged in the business of real-estate agents and brokers. This action is for the recovery of a share of commissions earned by them in the sale of certain real estate. The evidence went to show that the defendants had agreed to share with the plaintiff their commissions from such business of this kind as she might secure for them, and that she did bring about negotiations resulting in the sale referred to. The jury awarded a recovery of $243.75, and the verdict should be sustained, unless a release executed by the plaintiff was effectual to bar her action.
The only…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parlin v. SmallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1878
- Cannon v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883
- Brown v. BluntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1881
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Schmeisser v. AlbinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Cox v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.