Legal Opinion
B.S.L. One Owners Corp. v. Rubenstein
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided January 3, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas P. Aliotta, J.
In a summary proceeding, respondent Raeanne Rubenstein (hereinafter referred to as respondent) moves, pursuant to Multiple Dwelling Law §§ 301 and 302, to dismiss the petition and for partial summary judgment on her counterclaim seeking recovery of rent paid during the period that there has been no certificate of occupancy for the subject apartment. Petitioner has filed opposing papers and cross-moves, pursuant to CPLR 3211, to dismiss respondent’s defenses set forth in paragraphs "1” through "4” and "6” through "17” of the answer.
The undisputed facts…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cotheal v. . BrouwerNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
- Ward v. BochinoNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Chatsworth 72nd Street Corp. v. RigaiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pekelnaya v. AllynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005