Legal Opinion

Broadwell v. . Ray

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion by defendant in Supreme Court for certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J :

The affidavit upon which the motion for a certiorari is based avers omission of material evidence in the case as settled by the Judge and the affiant’s belief that the Judge will make the correction in that respect if given an opportunity to do so. The affiant gives as his reason for such belief that the Judge has informed his counsel that he had the evidence as taken down at the trial, and that he would furnish the same if the case is again placed before him. The affidavit negatives laches and avers merits. Peebles v. Braswell, 107 N. C., 68. This complies with all the requirements…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Pittman v. . KimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Peebles v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. McDaniel v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. State v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Cameron v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Slocumb v. Construction Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Allen v. . McLendonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Broadwell v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API