Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1939No. 613Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

307 U.S. 393 (1939)

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 613.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 29, 1939.

Decided May 29, 1939.

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS.

Mr. James R. Bell for petitioner.

Assistant Attorney General Whitaker, with whom Solicitor General Jackson, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney, Warner W. Gardner, and Aaron B. Holman were on the brief, for the United States.

2Opinion of the Court · ReedJustice Reed

This case involves the right of the Government to deduct from the public terminal-to-terminal tariffs of a railroad over a route, partly of land-grant aided mileage, identical with part of the mileage of another…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API