Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kansas City v. Keene Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 25, 1993No. 75332Published

1ConcurrenceHolstein, Judge

I fully concur in the majority opinion. However, I believe some additional observations are appropriate.

On occasion a punitive damages count is added to an ordinary action in contract or tort where there is no justification other than that a defendant is perceived to have a “deep pocket.” In such cases, the only conduct which may be characterized as evil *377is that the defendant is in business for profit and does not cease all operations when confronted with an inconclusive epidemiological study involving its product. In this case, had the defendant been an individual who had donated the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API