Baird v. Eflow Inv. Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCherry, C. J.
This is an action for damages for alleged fraud arising out of a contract for the exchange of real estate. A trial by jury was had. At the conclusion of the evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendants. From the judgment on the verdict, the plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff, a farmer and stock grower, had a ranch in Montana worth, as he claims, $50,000. He desired to dispose of it and employed the defendants Baird Realty Inv. Co. and W. Eccles Baird as brokers to find a purchaser for it. J. A. Millecam, who is named in the complaint as a defendant, but who was not served and who…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
- Campbell v. Zion's Co-op. Home Building & Real Estate Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
- Subke v. GonderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright v. Westside NurseryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
- Oberg v. SandersUtah Supreme Court · 1947
- Greenwell v. DuvallUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- Knightek, LLC v. Jive Commc'ns, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2018
- Healthcare Co Ltd v. MPI Group LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025