Legal Opinion
Poindexter v. Wachovia Mortgage Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1392PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Wachovia Mortgage Corporation, Wachovia Mortgage FSB (f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB and now known as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.), and Wells Fargo & Company. (Doc. 22.) For the reasons explained below, the Court finds that Defendants’ motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
“To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ ”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stokes, Billy v. Cross, StevenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Casey v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Degutis v. Financial Freedom, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Cole v. Stephen Einstein & Assocs., P.C.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012