Legal Opinion
Boyles v. Weber
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Petitioner Jason Boyles appeals from findings of fact, conclusions of law and order issued by the habeas court denying his application for writ of habeas corpus. Boyles argues 1) the habeas court erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; and 2) his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] After two trials, the first of which ended with a hung jury, Boyles was convicted of Second Degree Murder. The facts of that case and conviction are detailed in our decision affirming the conviction in State v. Boyles, 1997 SD 99,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vivian Sprynczynatyk and Paul Sprynczynatyk, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. BeachumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Loop v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moeller v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Vanden Hoek v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Gould v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- McDonough v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Steichen v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.