Connelly v. Doe ex dem. Skelly

Ejectment; trial by the Court upon the general issue, the usual consent rule being complied with, and a recovery by the plaintiff.

By a bill of exceptions containing the evidence, it appears that both parties derive title to the land in dispute through Zachariah Beaman — the appellee, by virtue of a sheriff’s sale which took place on an execution upon a judgment rendered on the 27th of September, 1842, in the county where the land lies — the appellant, by virtue of a deed executed a short time after the rendition of said judgment, by said Zachariah to one Jacob Beaman, who, afterwards,…