County of Sacramento v. Llanes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
Defendant Guadalupe Llanes appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a judgment of paternity as untimely. He contends his motion was timely. Alternatively, he argues plaintiff County of Sacramento (County) should be estopped from asserting the motion is untimely because California’s Department of Child Support Services (CDCSS) posted letters on its Web site stating that previously established fathers, such as defendant, had until December 31, 2006, to file a motion to set aside a judgment of paternity, and he relied on those letters in filing his motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines PartnershipCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Jonathan Vo v. Las Virgenes Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kern County Department of Child Support Services v. CamachoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Goble v. Fuller CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kennedy v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Z.W. v. E.R. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020