Legal Opinion

Deitch v. Dole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford A. Scott, J.), entered on or about January 13, 1989, to review a determination of respondent New York City Loft Board dated September 17, 1987, which determined petitioner’s occupancy of the subject unit commenced after June 21, 1982, and therefore did not qualify him for protection under article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law (Loft Law), unanimously dismissed and the determination confirmed, with costs.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there was substantial evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sewell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Lindemann v. American Horse Shows Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Amann v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Liu v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. LeSannom Building Corp. v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API