Legal Opinion
In Re: Michael W. Sheehan Wilhelmina Sheehan, Debtors. Yoji Oyama v. Michael W. Sheehan Wilhelmina Sheehan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2001No. 99-56391PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
253 F.3d 507 (9th Cir. 2001)
IN RE: MICHAEL W. SHEEHAN; WILHELMINA SHEEHAN, DEBTORS.
YOJI OYAMA, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL W. SHEEHAN; WILHELMINA SHEEHAN, APPELLEES.
No. 99-56391
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted February 14, 2001
Filed June 19, 2001
[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]
John R. Fuchs and Gail S. Gilfillan, Fuchs & Associates, Inc., Los Angeles, California, for the appellant.
Todd C. Ringstad, Irvine, California, for the appellees.
Appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Elizabeth L. Perris, Christopher M.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. KaneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Francois Tabi v. McCulloughDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Karen Zavala v. Ur JaddouDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Rodriguez v. County of San JoaquinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Wileman Bros. & Elliott, Inc. v. Y Farms, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020