Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Yarger
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 41, Calendar No. 38,417PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
This case involves the application of that portion of the motor vehicle law commonly known as the gnest act (Act No. 19, Pub. Acts 1929, 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 4648), which reads:
“Provided, however, That no person, transported by the owner or operator of a motor vehicle as his guest without payment for such transportation shall have a cause of action for damages against such owner or operator for injury, death or loss, in case of accident, unless such accident shall have been caused by the gross negligence or wilful and wanton misconduct of the owner or operator of such motor vehicle and unless…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Willett v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Goss v. OvertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Elowitz v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davidson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Schneider v. DraperMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Riley v. WaltersMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Sorenson v. WegertMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Holmes v. WeslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.