Legal Opinion
Neuenswander v. United States
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided March 22, 2006No. 1:05-cv-00082PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Paper 24)
MURTHA, District Judge.
Plaintiff William Neuenswander brings this medical malpractice action against the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), alleging that medical personnel at the White River Junction Veterans Administration Medical Center (“VAMC”) committed malpractice when they failed to properly treat his skin disease. The case is currently before the Court on the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Paper 8.)
The Magistrate Judge filed his…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- George Linardos v. Edmund Fortuna, Joan Fortuna and Susan Joan LinardosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Drexler v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Danny C. Rodriguez, as father and natural guardian of J.R., an infant v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Southern v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2007