Legal Opinion
Hosack v. Hosack
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 2004No. S-02-1405PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
NATURE OF CASE
In a petition for further review, Max Galen Hosack asserted that the Nebraska Court of Appeals erred in finding that it lacked jurisdiction to review a judgment of the Saunders County District Court. We granted Max’s petition for further review.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
Before reaching the legal issues presented for review, it is the duty of an appellate court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the matter before it. Cerny v. Longley, 266 Neb. 26, 661 N.W.2d 696 (2003).
In actions for dissolution of marriage, an appellate court reviews the case de novo on the record to determine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gibilisco v. GibiliscoNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. McElhoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Tyma v. TymaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Cerny v. LongleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- DeBose v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Webb v. American Employers GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Millatmal v. MillatmalNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Ashland v. Ashland Salvage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Dooling v. DoolingNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.