Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. McElhose

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1986No. 85-154PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiff-appellee, The Federal Land Bank of Omaha, a corporation, obtained two decrees foreclosing its mortgage upon land owned by the defendants-appellants, Gordon E. and Vlasta McElhose, husband and wife. In their appeal to this court the McElhoses assign as error the trial court’s (1) inclusion in the second of its decrees a certain 80-acre parcel of land which had been exempted by the parties and had been excluded from the operation of the court’s earlier decree, and (2) impliedly ruling in both decrees that the variable interest rate mortgage note the McElhoses executed was valid and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. SCHMUECKER BROS. IMPLEMENT CO. v. SobotkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Moore v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sederstrom v. WreheNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Devine v. Department of Public InstitutionsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Interest of JoshuaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Jantzen v. Diller Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cattle Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. WatsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In Re Interest of JANebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hoffman v. Reinke Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API