In re Interest of Marcella G.

Nebraska Advance Sheets 566 287 NEBRASKA REPORTS in fact, its order specifically noted that these convictions were unrelated. Hess’ argument is without merit. [8] Even assuming that the district court erred in referenc­ ing exhibit 3, such was not reversible error. In a civil case, the admission or exclusion of evidence is not reversible error unless it unfairly prejudiced a substantial right of the com­ plaining party.20 A review of the order demonstrates that the district court did not consider these convictions in reference to the question presented—whether Hess had made the neces­ sary…