Legal Opinion

Miller v. Washington National Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Upon this appeal'from an: order overruling a demurrer ■ filed -by"defendant on the. ground-that'the facts alleged in the complaint were insufficient to constitute a cause of action, it suffices to note the following facts. Plaintiff is the beneficiary under a travel and pedestrian accident policy issued to George Zander. While he was driving a motor truck for his employer the tire on an inner wheel of the dual rear wheels of the truck became deflated so as to prevent the further use of the truck on the intended trip until repairs could be made. Imaccordance with his employer’s instructions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kingsley v. American Central Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Wertman v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Eynon v. Continental Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RustTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Merklein v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lukaszewicz v. Concrete Research, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Green v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. McCowley v. North American Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. First Continental Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. HankinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Batchelor v. Liberty National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API