Legal Opinion

Houston Nat. Exch. Bank v. Osceola Irrigating Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1923No. 8405Published

1Opinion

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

In a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, complaint is made of the following paragraph of our original opinion:

“The record discloses that the proceeds from the sale of the rice, which, under the agreement, is the sole subject-matter in dispute, is insufficient to pay the amount round due the intervener and the amount adjudged plaintiff for rent. This being so, the error of the court, in adjudging plaintiff a lien for supplies and advances, which we have hereinbefore discussed and pointed out, becomes immaterial and will not authorize a reversal of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McDavid v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Watson v. D. A. Paddleford & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Ross v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API