Besterman v. Besterman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 52, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1916, No. 4805, in Equity, dismissing plaintiff’s bill in the case of Harry Besterman v. Sarah Besterman et al. Bill in equity by husband against wife to have her declared a trustee of money and real estate given to her before and after marriage. Before Ferguson, J. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s bill.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 52, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1916, No. 4805, in Equity, dismissing plaintiff’s bill in the case of Harry Besterman v. Sarah Besterman et al. Bill in equity by husband against wife to have her declared a trustee of money and real estate given to her before and after marriage. Before Ferguson, J. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s bill. The court made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: findings of fact. On the bill, answer and proofs, the court finds the following facts: 1. Plaintiff was a boxer and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find nothing in the fifty-nine assignments of error calling for a disturbance of this decree, and it is affirmed, at appellant’s costs, on the nine facts found and the three legal conclusions reached by the learned chancellor below;.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Semenza v. AlfanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Brown v. NagleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Semenza v. AlfanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971