Legal Opinion

Brown v. Nagle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1934No. Appeal, 353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This is a proceeding in equity instituted by Bertha R. Brown to compel the defendant to account for certain sums of money allegedly held for her use. The defendant filed an answer to the bill, claiming certain credits against the fund. Apart from a few minor adjustments, which will be noted later, the court below allowed these credits and entered a money decree in favor of plaintiff in the amount of only $41.35. Plaintiff has appealed from this decree, filing numerous assignments of error to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court below and arguing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Earnest's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Gassner v. GassnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Walters v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Buckwalter Stove Co. v. EdmondsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Werle v. WerleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Lapayowker v. Lincoln College Preparatory SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Christy v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Liebendofer v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Peardon v. PeardonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API