In re the Detention of Ronald Tripp
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
MANSFIELD, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. The majority correctly determines that Ronald Tripp was not "presently confined" for a sexually violent offense at the time the State filed its sexually violent predator (SVP) petition. However, there is substantial evidence that Tripp committed a "recent overt act" - namely, the attempted sexual abuse of a woman in 2013. This was the State's alternative ground for SVP
*420commitment of Tripp. The district court failed to make a finding here only because it didn't think it had to.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. DullardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- In Re the Detention of GarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- In RE the Detention of Jonathan Edwin Stenzel Jonathan Edwin StenzelSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State of Iowa v. Brock McRey BurgdorfCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
- In Re Detention of BradfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006