Legal Opinion

State v. Bagley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 1999No. 97CR0674AB; CA A100687PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), ORS 164.135. He had three prior convictions for UUV. His placement on the sentencing guidelines grid block was 3-C, with a presumptive sentence of two years’ probation. However, based on ORS 137.717, which requires a mandatory minimum sentence of 13 months’ incarceration for UUV with one prior conviction, and defendant’s two additional prior convictions, the court imposed an 18-month sentence, with 24 months’ post-prison supervision. Defendant appeals, assigning error to that sentence. We review for errors of law. ORS…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. TracyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JennichesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API