Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 4, 1995No. 83179Published

1Opinion of the Court

897 P.2d 1116 (1994)

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

OKLAHOMA CORPORATION COMMISSION and State of Oklahoma, Appellees.

No. 83179.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 15, 1994.

As Corrected on Limited Grant of Rehearing April 4, 1995.[*]

Melanie S. Fannin, Roger K. Toppins, Charles J. Scharnberg, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Lawrence R. Edmison, Maribeth D. Snapp, Leslie Wilson Pepper, Okl. Corp. Com'n, Oklahoma City, for appellees.

SUMMERS, Justice.

The Corporation Commission issued Order No. 380024 in Cause No. RM XXXXXXXXX, and thereby promulgated rules that required telephone…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Indiana National Bank v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, Local 2309Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API