Legal Opinion
Holtz v. Babcock
Montana Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1963No. 10536Published
1Opinion
On Petition eok Rehearing.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON:
In this cause both appellant and respondents have filed petitions for rehearing, it being contended that our decision is either in conflict with an express statute or controlling decision to which the attention of the court was not directed, or that material facts were overlooked by the court.
AVe shall first discuss the contentions raised by the re*372spondents. It is their assertion that under subdivision 3 of 'section 93-501-1, R.C.M.1947, we should take judicial notice of a proclamation issued by the Honorable Tim M. Babcock,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Town of South Ottawa v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chovanak v. MatthewsMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- People ex rel. McCallister v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.