Legal Opinion
Farnell Et Ux. v. Winterloch Corp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 12, 1987No. Appeal, 3373 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Barry,
The Township of Nether Providence (Township) appeals from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, which was entered in favor of Samuel and Rosemary Farnell (the Farnells) on November 18, 1983, for damages caused to the Farnells’ property (Lot 23) by soil érosion. A joint and several verdict was entered against the developer, the Winterloch Corporation (Winterloch), for failure to develop Lot 23 in accordance with either approved plans or the Township’s erosion control ordinance (Ordinance 478) and against the Township for failure to enforce Ordinance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Cantwell v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Mariscotti v. TinariSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Wade v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Helmick v. South Union TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Levenson v. SouserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Ariondo v. MUNSEYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Shippen Township v. Portage TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Shippen Township v. Portage TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Farnell Et Ux. v. Winterloch Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.