Legal Opinion
State v. Seymour
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1917No. 2946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District; Hon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. C. D. Seymour was convicted for obtaining a promissory note by false pretenses, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFbick, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining a certain promissory note from one C. G. Johnson, by false pretenses. He appeals from the judgment of conviction.
In view that the sufficiency of the information was assailed by general demurrer, which is insisted on in this court, and for the reasons hereinafter appearing, we give the facts charged as constituting the offense in full. They are:
“The said C. D. Seymour on the 16th day of March, A. D. 1915, at the county of Utah, in the state of Utah, did then and there with intent to cheat and defraud C. G. Johnson of his personal property,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Gould v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Commonwealth v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Ogden Valley Trout & Resort Co. v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. MerryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ForsheeUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Webb v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. HannaUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. McGowanUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. WoodsUtah Supreme Court · 1923