Vinton Eppsco Inc. v. Showe Homes, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court exceeded the mandate of this Court upon remand by awarding appellee (Showe) appellate attorney fees. We find that it did and hereby reverse the trial court.
Appellant (Eppsco) sued Showe and William Coady (Coady) for non-payment for plumbing materials supplied to Coady, an unlicensed plumber, for use in the construction of Showe’s building. Eppsco obtained judgment against Coady and executed a writ of garnishment on Showe. The Valencia County District Court dissolved the writ of garnishment and awarded Showe…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Coons v. CoonsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Swain v. Salt Lake Real Estate and Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
- Bank of New Mexico v. PriestleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Glaser v. DannelleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Slattery v. Covey & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. ThevenetNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. FrankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Martinez v. POJOAQUE GAMING, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.