Legal Opinion

Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Thevenet

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1984No. 14903PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

Plaintiffs Central Adjustment Bureau and Vista Sandia Hospital (Central Adjustment) obtained a default judgment against defendant Corrine Vener Thevenet for a debt on an open account. When they were unable to collect from Corrine, a garnishment was issued and a judgment entered against Equitable Life Assurance Society (garnishee), the employer of defendant’s husband, Stanley Thevenet (Stanley). A judgment against garnishee in the amount of one-half of twenty-five percent of Stanley’s disposable income each pay period ultimately was entered in favor of plaintiffs.

Because…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Finberg v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Aboud v. AdamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Southern Union Exploration Co. v. Wynn Exploration Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. McDonald v. SennNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Boudar v. E.G. & G., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jemko, Inc. v. LiaghatNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Gurule v. AultNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API