Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Holland

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1986No. 17116PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice:

In this original proceeding in habeas corpus, the relator, Randy M. Morrison, asserts that his due process rights were violated when the trial court over his objection gave an alibi instruction that had been held constitutionally deficient in Adkins v. Bordenkircher, 674 F.2d 279 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 853, 103 S.Ct. 119, 74 L.Ed.2d 104 (1982), and State v. Kopa, 173 W.Va. 43, 311 S.E.2d 412 (1983).

The relator was indicted in January, 1980 by a Kanawha County grand jury for the crime of robbery by violence. The alleged crime took place on August 30, 1979. The…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State of West Virginia Terry Allen BlevinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API