Muckenfuss v. Fishburne
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Dorchester, November, 1902. Foreclosure by Harriet E. Muckenfuss against Helen M. Fishburne and Sophia F. S. Marion. Defendants appeal from order refusing to set aside judgment of foreclosure. cites: Code, 195; 34 S. C., 246; 2 Dan. on Neg. Inst, sec. 1338; 21 S. C., 375. cite: 58 'S. C., 453.
1Opinion of the Court
December 8, 1903. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This action was instituted January 3d 1901, for the foreclosure of a mortgage on two lots situated in the town of Summerville, S.C. given by Helen M. Fishburne, March 3d 1894, to secure the payment of a bond executed to the plaintiff by Helen M. Fishburne and Sophie F.S. Marion. Plaintiff also demanded judgment against the defendants for the amount due on the bond. Mrs. Fishburne in her answer denies all liability under the bond and mortgage, alleging that she signed the same, at the request of her husband, as guarantor or surety of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Muckenfuss v. FishburneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carsten v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Grieve v. HuberWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- McDaniel v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Wachesaw Plantation East Community Services Ass'n v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- R. D. Goldberg Theatre Corp. v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.