Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Rittenhouse Towers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1984No. 1663PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, Judge:

In this case, Paul R. Rosen appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting a petition to strike a lis pendens filed by Rittenhouse Towers, et. al. The suit arose out of appellant’s attempt to purchase a penthouse condominium unit in Rittenhouse Towers from appellees.

Appellee Hotel Rittenhouse Associates (hereinafter referred to as “HRA”) is the owner of Rittenhouse Towers, a condominium/hotel which, at time of suit, was under construction in Rittenhouse Square, Philadelphia. On October 17, 1980, appellant Rosen issued a $5,000.00 check to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Zlotziver v. ZlotziverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Dice v. BenderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. CMWLTH., DEPT. OF ENV. R. v. Pa. Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Burns v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hostetter v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Barak, G. v. Karolizki, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Roberson v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API