Legal Opinion

Jackson Excavating Co. v. Administrative Hearing Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 23, 1983No. 63768PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. REINHARD, Special Judge.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether machinery and equipment used to process “raw” water into potable water is machinery used in manufacturing and, thus, exempt from the sales and use tax.

In 1977, petitioner, Jackson Excavating Company, entered into a contract with Missouri Utilities Company of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to construct a water treatment purification plant, known as Treatment Plant No. 2. In the course of completing the contract, petitioner purchased and installed certain machinery and equipment necessary to purify water for human…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daily Record Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Goldberg v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. West Lake Quarry & Material Co. v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. Floyd Charcoal Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Heidelberg Central, Inc. v. Director of Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1992
  2. Concord Publishing House, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Bridge Data Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API