Legal Opinion

City of Houston v. United Compost Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1972No. 15791PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of ap-pellee by which it recovered from appellant the sum of $2,093,669.95 as damages growing out of the breach by appellant of a contract with appellee under which appel-lee agreed to construct and operate a garbage composting plant. The case was submitted to the jury on three theories of recovery. The first theory was breach of a valid contract by appellant, and the second, and alternative, theory was a contract implied in law. The third asserted estoppel to deny the validity of the contract. The jury’s answers to all controlling fact…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Northeast Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Triton Oil & Gas Corporation v. EW Moran Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Thomas O'Connor & Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Village of Chefornak v. Hooper Bay Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Perseus of N.E., MA, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Scown v. City of Alpine, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API