City of Houston v. United Compost Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Justice.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of ap-pellee by which it recovered from appellant the sum of $2,093,669.95 as damages growing out of the breach by appellant of a contract with appellee under which appel-lee agreed to construct and operate a garbage composting plant. The case was submitted to the jury on three theories of recovery. The first theory was breach of a valid contract by appellant, and the second, and alternative, theory was a contract implied in law. The third asserted estoppel to deny the validity of the contract. The jury’s answers to all controlling fact…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Northeast Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Koy v. SchneiderTexas Supreme Court · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Triton Oil & Gas Corporation v. EW Moran Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Thomas O'Connor & Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Village of Chefornak v. Hooper Bay Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Perseus of N.E., MA, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Scown v. City of Alpine, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.