Legal Opinion

Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Tetirick, Gdn.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1938No. 26425PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were in serious disagreement as to plaintiff’s claimed right to collect monthly disability payments on an insurance policy. At a conference on the matter each earnestly and vigorously presented his theory and contentions. The plaintiff insisted that the monthly payments be made and defendant insisted that the policy be canceled. No agreement was reached and plaintiff terminated the conference.

Then plaintiff filed this suit, claiming in effect that he had'been convalescing from a nervous breakdown; that the defendant in the conference attempted intimidation and threats,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bowe v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  2. Bennett v. City National Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Bundren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Reeves v. MeltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API