Starr v. Berry
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Weintraub, C. J.
The Chancery Division of the Superior Court dismissed the complaint under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified the pending appeal on our own motion. Also before us is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that plaintiffs accepted the benefits of the judgment they attack.
I
We first will consider the motion to dismiss the appeal. The judgment provided in part that if plaintiffs should institute an action in California within 90 days from the date thereof, defendants…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Irving Trust Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Glover v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hill v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
3Cited by29 opinions
- Waste Management, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- D'AGOSTINO v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Amercoat Corp. v. Reagent Chem. & Research Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Tp. of Washington v. CENT. BERGEN COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.