Legal Opinion

Hill v. Peterson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 3, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

The demurrers of the defendants should have been overruled. The bill alleges that the defendants, residents of this Commonwealth, claim title to a farm in Rhode Island as heirs at law of John Hill, and that Hill in his lifetime bought the farm wholly with money supplied by the plaintiff but in violation of his agreement with the plaintiff and of her instructions took the title in his own name. These are sufficient allegations of a resulting trust in the land in favor of the plaintiff. Bailey v. Hemenway, 147 Mass. 326, 328. Gerace v. Gerace, 301 Mass. 14, 17-18. Cohen v. Simon, 304 Mass. 375,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Gardner v. . OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Atlantic National Bank v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Akin v. WarnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Starr v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Hornig v. HornigMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  3. Herman v. EdingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Rudow v. FogelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Silvia v. LewisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API