Legal Opinion
Jerry Von Rohr v. Reliance Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 21, 2016No. 15-2392PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSEN, District Judge.
Jerry Von Rohr was an executive at Reliance Bank. After the bank terminated Von Rohr, he requested payment for the one year remaining on his employment contract. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) advised that the payment was a prohibited “golden parachute,” which the bank could not make without prior agency approval. Von Rohr filed suit against the bank and the FDIC. He alleged a breach of contract under Missouri law and sought a declaration that federal law does not prohibit the payment. The district court 2 upheld the FDIC determination and granted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Diane Bolderson v. City of WentzvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. FairclothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- F. Bauer v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Rosenberger v. United Community Bancshares, IncAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
- Bauer v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.